Muon trigger - simulation
- responsibility matrix
- software developement schedule
- simulation studies
- physics questions
- track bending, 1
- track bending, 2
- RPC trigger simulation - front page
- RPC trigger simulation - components
- simulation of PACT algorithm
- experience with MTRIG
- future of MTRIG
- next steps with MTRIG
- coding convention for RPC hits
- simulation butterfly
- MTRIG simple flow chart
- MTRIG full flow chart
- MTRIG step by step
- MTRIG - old and new
- many particle calculations
- coherent simulation of DT, CSC, and RPC/PPC
- sharpness definition
- criteria for muon triggers
- safety margins
- algorithm safety
- sources of hits
- characteristics of minimum bias events
- muon secondaries
- punchthrough parametrisation
- charged hit rates
- neutral hit rates
- charged and neutral hit rates
- trigger rates due to netrals
- RPC occupacy due to neutrals
- simulation of neutral hits
- beam halo, 1
- beam halo, 2
- efficiency curves
- efficiency parametrisation
- treatment of inefficiencies - rates
- trigger rate components (1)
- trigger rate components (2)
- trigger rates at various luminosities
- trigger rate components and cuts (TP)
- 1 and 2 mu trigger rates and cuts (TP)
- low luminosity rates
- trigger rates (LOI)
- trigger thresholds and rates - summary
- trigger rates - Pythia 5.6 vs 5.7
- 1 mu trigger thresholds and rates
- 2 mu trigger thresholds and rates
- study of particle rates with PYTHIA
- inclusive b cross section - extrapolation to LHC
- b -> mu cross section - extrapolation to LHC
- parametisation of muon and hadron rates
- comparision of rates for 14 and 16 TeV
- comparision of old and new particle rates
- comparision of old and new trigger rates
- RPC geometry in CMSIM007
- low and high p_t trigger
- mu+/mu- assymetry
- less staggered geometry
- acceptance vs staggering
- acceptance vs eta
- dead areas vs gap and wheel widht
- origin of dead areas in eta
- RPC acceptance: conclusions
- RPC acceptance for 2/4, 3/4 and 4/4 stations
- trigger efficiency of "strong 3/4" algorithm: "good" region (80% of 4/4)
- trigger efficiency of "strong 3/4" algorithm: "bad" region (50% of 4/4)
- stability - front page
- cut quality - front page
- pattern tails
- cut quality plots
- cut quality - conclusions
GW